I enjoy a series on ABC Local radio which is called
Conversations with Richard Fidler. It airs
at 11 o’clock each morning but I subscribe to the podcasts so I can hear them
any time. One I’ve listened to this week
featured Ian Brown, a Canadian journalist whose son, Walker was born with a
very rare genetic disorder. There may
only be about 130 people in the world with this condition. Walker is now 14; when he was born there were
probably 8 known cases, when he was 5, there were 20.
Ian Brown says: doctors can now keep these
severely disabled children alive and then they hand them over to the parents to
look after. I suspect that, twenty years
ago, some doctors might have made the decision not to go to too much trouble to
help such a child to survive. But today,
what doctor would take the chance?
Walker can’t talk, seems to have no awareness of his surroundings and, if not restrained, hits himself constantly. Nobody knows why. Like all parents in this situation, Ian and his wife are often asked: If you could, would you change Walker. Of course, we would, they say, not just for our sake but for Walker’s as well. How could we sentence him to the life he is leading now? We have become used to parents of such children saying, sentimentally: We love him just the way he is. It’s refreshing to hear an honest answer to the perennial question.
The conversation raised a lot of questions and some pretty significant philosophical issues. Ian Brown has written a book, The Boy in the Moon and I am going to have to read it.
Walker can’t talk, seems to have no awareness of his surroundings and, if not restrained, hits himself constantly. Nobody knows why. Like all parents in this situation, Ian and his wife are often asked: If you could, would you change Walker. Of course, we would, they say, not just for our sake but for Walker’s as well. How could we sentence him to the life he is leading now? We have become used to parents of such children saying, sentimentally: We love him just the way he is. It’s refreshing to hear an honest answer to the perennial question.
Like most parents with severely disabled children, Ian has
often thought of suicide. In a
particularly Canadian way, he thinks of taking Walker into the mountains and
lying down in a snow drift together. At
one point, though, Walker appeared on the point of death and his parents couldn’t
contemplate what their lives would be like without him.
Ian Brown says that one of the hardest things to live with
is the way that people stare at Walker – a disfigured 14-year old in a
stroller. Teenage girls are the
worst. I loved his description of how
this occurs. He says that teenage girls live
a life of conflict, at the same time wanting to stand out but needing to fit
in. They travel in threes, two short
ones and a tall one. They are all dressed
the same – brief top, short skirts, the same wrist bands and so on.
The tall one is the leader and when she sees
Walker she puts her hand to her mouth and leans down to whisper to the other
two, and then they all stop and stare.
Ian says they are looking at their future as mothers and realising how
hard that might be.The conversation raised a lot of questions and some pretty significant philosophical issues. Ian Brown has written a book, The Boy in the Moon and I am going to have to read it.
The hard part is
trying to answer the questions Walker raises in my mind every time I pick him
up. What is the value of a life like this – a life lived in twilight and often
in pain? What is the cost of his life to those around him? “We spend a million
dollars to save them,” a doctor said to me not long ago. “But then, when they’re
discharged, we ignore them.”
No comments:
Post a Comment