I think the trend began when Princess Di was killed and the British public went mad. It was mass behaviour so unforeseen that it raised eyebrows and led to an investigation. Why did a stoic nation like Britain produce such an outpouring of grief? The report came to the conclusion that, with the breakdown of society, churches and the like, "Britain has become a nation of isolated individuals looking to unite over a national tragedy or movement. What really drives the behaviour is the need to be seen to care. And they want to be seen displaying compassion because they want to be loved themselves."
Clearly, Australia is no different. And don't the politicians make a meal of it! Special envoys flying here and there, ceremonies to welcome the remains to an airfield somewhere, Operation Bring Them Home, and so on.
There's a serious lack of quiet dignity in all of this and a lack of understanding of the need for the real mourners to come to terms with their loss without being elbowed aside by those who are trying to manipulate the whole tragedy for their own benefit.
John, thank you for this post. Although I don't agree entirely I have appreciated the opportunity to reflect on the points you have raised. I must say that our politicians are continually attempting to balance their responsibilities as leaders with the political necessity of maintaing a popularity rating. The public's ability to monitor and measure the integrity of it's leaders is largely dependant on the media. The media understand this and often play the role of circus conductor to ensure good ratings, too often resulting in the clown-like behaviour of Australia's leaders.
ReplyDelete